New Poll
Also, if you do not mind, please post your reasons for voting the way you did (i.e. why you voted "yes"; why "no"; etc.).
Last thing of note about the poll. It was a free service provided by Bravenet so there will probably be "pop-ups" which may come up on your screen (unless you have a pop-up blocker service). Please excuse any pop-ups that may come up. I will remove the poll in about a week and any pop-ups that came with the service will be eliminated with the removal of the poll from the blog.
Thank you for voting and do feel free to post why you voted the way you did in the comments section of this post.
2 Comments:
I voted no because Scripture clearly teaches it... If we start overuling Scripture, where do we stop. That being said, I don't fully understand why women cannot teach Bible studies with men present.
The bible teaches all sorts of things, some of which have been fulfilled/replaced already in the canon. In this case, think of 'no male or female' in Christ Jesus (Gal). Not only that, we have to contextualise what the bible teaches, and not suppose something ontological about women. It's easy for us men to say 'no women preachers'. But the truth is, they are often a lot more giften than men in preaching. The bible is not a treausry of propositions for us to mindlessly impliment in the church.
I voted a big 'yes' to women preachers.
Post a Comment
<< Home