About "Hell"
While I honestly do not think we (theologically or otherwise) truly know too much about hell, I still think the best explanation of what hell is, is this. I believe hell is when a person has seen God for who He truly is (the beatific vision, if you will), thus having a full desire for God, and then being removed from Him. Thus, that person is left alone with the full knowledge of who God truly is, having seen Him, and has the greatest possible desire for God but this desire will never be attained or satisfied because the person has been removed (or separated) from that.
Several ideas were thrown on the discussion table about how hell is possibly total self absorption to the point of complete inward desperation. However, if all one knows is self, and one never knows God or being in the presence of God, how is this hell? Moreover, this idea does not seem far too removed from how many people actually are today in this presence life. Anyway, last night’s discussion really made me think, so I thought I would post a few short and quick thoughts here to possibly get some feedback on the issue. So if you feel inclined to do so, please post your thoughts on this issue in the comments.
2 Comments:
Why would a supposedly good and loving God condemn good people to Hell just because they aren't (real) Christians?
That's so silly and picky from an omnipotent point of view.
god's skeptic,
good question. My only response would be that the question itself is built upon a false premise - i.e. "good" people being condemned.
In response to that supposition (premise), I would have to ask, what constitutes a person as "good?" Also, what do you mean by "good."
I'm not sure what you mean by ". . . because they aren't (real) Christians." What other "kind" of Christian is there?
Post a Comment
<< Home